Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 Earnings Concall Highlights (Good, bad, improving,worsening)

Last Updated: January 26, 2026

7 Min Read

Share

Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights capture how Bank of Maharashtra is sustaining above-guidance profitability through improved asset quality, disciplined credit growth, and a deliberate shift in liability strategy. Bank of Maha is a public sector bank in India with a growing footprint across retail and MSME lending, focusing on stronger RAM (Retail, Agri, MSME) mix, granular liability franchise, and improved operating efficiency to enhance RoA/RoE outcomes.

The bank’s stated strategy is to scale quality credit growth while reducing dependence on high-cost deposits, improve CASA stability through relationship-led acquisition, and maintain strong underwriting to contain slippages and keep credit costs low.

Management Commentary (Key Messages)

In the Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights, management stated that profitability and overall performance are tracking above beginning-of-year guidance across key metrics. A key management message was that the bank is prioritizing profitability and balance sheet quality, even if it means deposit growth is not maximized in the near term, driven by a deliberate shift away from high-cost deposits.

Management emphasized “profitability first” and “growth quality” as core themes. Loan book expansion remains strong, supported by retail engines, while liability strategy is being optimized to protect NIM and sustain RoA. The bank also reiterated comfort on asset quality trajectory, with GNPA/NNPA levels among the better performers in the PSU banking space.

Financial Snapshot (Quarter)

  • Quarter: Q3 FY26
  • Credit growth (Advances): Guidance ~17%, delivered ~20% YoY (as per management commentary)
  • Deposit growth: +15.3% YoY (guidance 14%)
  • Loan mix (RAM:Corporate): Target ~60:40 (±2); delivered 63:37
  • NIM: Guidance 3.75%; achieved 3.87%
  • ROA: 1.86% (guidance 1.75%)
  • ROE: 23.79% (guidance >20%)
  • Cost-to-income: 37.19%
  • Asset quality: GNPA 1.60%, NNPA 0.15%
Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights

Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights: What Changed This Quarter?

The quarter reinforced Bank of Maha’s positioning as a high-profitability PSU bank, with strong NIM, strong RoA/RoE delivery, and stable asset quality. The notable strategic change in the Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights was management’s explicit stance on liability management—deposit growth may lag at times because the bank is reducing dependence on high-cost deposits to protect margins.

✅ GOOD (Positive Highlights)

  • Above-guidance performance: Management indicated the bank is tracking above beginning-of-year guidance across key metrics.
  • Strong NIM delivery: NIM came in at 3.87%, above guidance of 3.75%, reflecting disciplined pricing and liability management.
  • Best-in-class profitability: ROA at 1.86% (above 1.75% guidance) and ROE at 23.79% highlight strong earnings quality.
  • Strong credit growth: Advances delivered ~20% YoY (vs guided 17%), showing strong franchise momentum.
  • Healthy mix: RAM:Corporate at 63:37 supports better yield stability and granular risk profile.
  • Asset quality remains strong: GNPA at 1.60% and NNPA at 0.15% indicate strong underwriting and recoveries.
  • Operational efficiency strong: Cost-to-income at 37.19%

❌ BAD (Negatives)

  • Deposit growth lag acknowledged: Management acknowledged deposit growth lag versus credit growth across remarks, highlighting a potential structural constraint.
  • Deliberate shift away from high-cost deposits: While margin-positive, this can reduce near-term deposit momentum and require stronger CASA acquisition efforts.
  • Funding competition risk: In a competitive rate environment, scaling deposits at acceptable cost remains a watch item.

📈 IMPROVING (What is Getting Better)

  • Profitability metrics strengthening: RoA at 1.86% and RoE at 23.79% reflect improving core profitability engine.
  • Margin resilience: NIM above guidance indicates the bank is handling rate competition well through cost of funds control.
  • Asset quality improving/stable: Low NNPA (0.15%) implies improved recoveries, underwriting discipline, and low credit cost trend.
  • RAM-heavy growth model: Maintaining a 63:37 RAM:Corporate mix improves quality and reduces concentration risk.

📉 WORSENING / RISKS

  • Deposit-funding risk: If deposits do not keep pace with advances, the bank may face higher incremental funding costs or need alternative funding.
  • Margin risk if funding cost rises: A sustained deposit competition cycle can pressure NIM despite management’s efforts.
  • Growth-quality balance: Sustaining 20% credit growth while maintaining asset quality requires continued underwriting discipline and monitoring of early delinquencies.

Outlook & Guidance (What Mgmt Said Next)

  • Confidence on guidance: Management stated performance is tracking above beginning-of-year guidance across metrics.
  • NIM outlook: Management expects NIM strength to continue, supported by shift away from high-cost deposits and mix discipline.
  • Credit growth stance: Continue strong growth, with preference for RAM-led quality expansion.
  • Deposits strategy: Liability acquisition will prioritize cost discipline; management remains willing to sacrifice some deposit growth to protect profitability.

Macro & Sector View

The Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights align with a broader banking macro where deposit competition remains intense, and margin durability depends on funding strategy and liability franchise strength. Sector themes influencing near-term performance include:

  • Deposit competition: Higher term deposit rates across the system pressure cost of funds.
  • Credit cycle strength: Strong retail/MSME credit demand supports growth, but requires underwriting discipline.
  • Asset quality normalization: PSU banks with stronger recoveries and low slippages continue to re-rate on RoA/RoE delivery.

Competitive Positioning (Why it May Win)

  • High profitability PSU profile: RoA at 1.86% stands out among peer PSBs.
  • Strong asset quality: GNPA 1.60% and NNPA 0.15% provide confidence on credit cost sustainability.
  • Efficient operating model: Cost-to-income at 37.19% supports steady earnings compounding.
  • Mix discipline: RAM-heavy portfolio reduces cyclicality and improves yield stability.
  • Clear liability strategy: Shift away from high-cost deposits supports NIM defense in a competitive funding market.

Key Growth Drivers Going Ahead

  • RAM engine scaling: Retail/MSME expansion remains a key driver with better risk distribution.
  • Liability franchise improvement: Building stable CASA and granular deposits at reasonable cost can sustain NIM.
  • Credit quality discipline: Continued low slippages and strong recoveries can keep credit costs subdued.
  • Operating efficiency: Maintaining low cost-to-income supports RoA expansion even if NIM normalizes.

Analyst Takeaway / Final Verdict

Overall, the Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights are constructive for investors: strong NIM at 3.87%, strong profitability (RoA 1.86%, RoE 23.79%), and strong asset quality (GNPA 1.60%, NNPA 0.15%). The biggest watchpoint is funding—deposit growth versus credit growth—especially as the bank deliberately reduces high-cost deposits. If management executes liability strengthening without sacrificing NIM, Bank of Maha can sustain a premium profitability profile among PSU peers.

Verdict Card (Investor-Friendly)

  • Business momentum: Strong (Credit growth ~20% YoY)
  • Margins: Very Strong (NIM 3.87% > guidance)
  • Profitability: Best-in-class (RoA 1.86%, RoE 23.79%)
  • Asset quality: Excellent (GNPA 1.60%, NNPA 0.15%)
  • Key risk: Deposit funding pace vs credit growth
  • Investor stance: Positive (quality PSB with strong profitability, monitor funding)

FAQ

What are Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights?

Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights include above-guidance profitability, NIM at 3.87%, RoA at 1.86%, RoE at 23.79%, and strong asset quality with GNPA 1.60% and NNPA 0.15%.

Why is Bank of Maha focusing on shifting away from high-cost deposits?

Management wants to protect NIM and sustain high RoA by controlling funding cost. This means the bank may not chase deposits aggressively if they are expensive.

Is deposit growth a concern for Bank of Maha?

Deposit growth is a key watch item because credit growth is strong. Management acknowledged the gap but stated deposit strategy is deliberate to avoid margin dilution.

How strong is asset quality for Bank of Maha in Q3 FY26?

Asset quality metrics are strong with GNPA at 1.60% and NNPA at 0.15%, reflecting better underwriting, recoveries and low stress in the book.

What should investors track in upcoming quarters?

Investors should track deposit growth pace, cost of funds, NIM trajectory, and whether credit expansion remains RAM-led while maintaining low slippages and stable asset quality.

Useful Links

GBIW Pulse

Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 Earnings Concall Highlights (Good, bad, improving,worsening)

GOOD:

Bank of Maha Q3 FY26 earnings concall highlights are OUT!

✅ NIM beats guidance 💥 (3.87%)
✅ RoA super strong 🚀 (1.86%)
✅ GNPA just 1.60% 😮
⚠️ Watch deposit pace vs credit growth 👀

A PSU bank compounding story with profitability-first mindset! 💪📈

BAD:

IMPROVING:

WORSENING:

COMPANY PROFILE: